${site.data.firmName}${SEMFirmNameAlt}
Four Years On, The Legacy Of Deepwater Horizon Remains Intensely Controversial For The Oil Industry
Practice Areas
back to top

Four Years On, The Legacy Of Deepwater Horizon Remains Intensely Controversial For The Oil Industry

While the NWF's study has been disputed, at least some evidence from other major spills indicates there can be long-term legacy on local ecosystems. This month, for example, also marks the 25thanniversary of the iconic Exxon Valdez disaster (when millions of gallons of oil were spilled in Alaska) where some species, including herring fish stocks, has still reportedly not fully recovered.

In this context, voices of disquiet continue to be raised about the safety of oil drilling. Here broad-ranging concerns of environmentalists are at least two-fold.

Firstly, the huge international focus devoted to the 2010 disaster can obscure the fact that significant spills also occur elsewhere in the world on a relatively regular basis. In Nigeria, for instance, one 2006 report by environmentalists reportedly reached the staggering conclusion that the Niger Delta region has experienced the equivalent of an Exxon Valdez leak every year for almost half a century.

Secondly, much concern remains specifically focused on deepwater drilling locations where, over the last 5 years, it is estimated that some 60% of new international hydrocarbon reserves have been discovered. It is asserted that, despite ongoing reviews to safety measures, and better technology, the prospect of future disasters, potentially akin to Deepwater Horizon, remains significant owing in part to the remoteness and depth of some locations, and the resulting challenges posed by recovery of oil.

While scientific and technological innovation can enable greater safety in the future, 'risk free' drilling is unrealistic. Moreover, modern technology can be a double-edged sword for oil companies.

This factor was emphasised in a report last week by reinsurance broker Willis Group. The study asserted that too much of the energy sector has no insurance against major cyber attacks and that this could threaten "a major energy catastrophe - on the same scale - as...Exxon Valdez or Deepwater Horizon".

As the report noted, modern technology now allows oil and gas networks to be operated remotely. However, this provides scope for hackers and /or computer viruses to potentially target the electronic infrastructure meaning oil pipelines or refineries could be placed at new risk.

According to the study, the US Department for Homeland Security asserts that over 40% of attacks on US critical national infrastructure was targeted on energy firms in the year to September 2012. Willis claims that this situation represents a "time bomb" and that energy companies need to enhance their cyber defences.

Despite these conventional and unconventional challenges, the post-2010 appetite of major oil firms to operate in deepwater areas remains strong. Firstly, despite the risks, these locations are proving a rewarding frontier for oil exploration.

And given rising global demand for energy, not least in emerging markets, governments are generally permitting firms to operate in deepwater locations. In the Gulf of Mexico, for instance, the US government awarded the first new post-disaster deepwater drilling permit in March 2011, less than a year after the spill began.

Indeed, earlier this year Washington also, controversially, lifted its suspension on BP BP -0.61% securing new leases in the Gulf in exchange for an agreement whereby the company must comply with specific corporate governance, ethics, and safety procedures. Following this decision, BP was the highest bidder last month on 24 of 31 new leases for exploration in the region valued at over 40 billion dollars.

Another key reason why offshore drilling will continue apace is the resilience of leading oil firms to wide-ranging international risks. The scale and profitability of these giants typically equips them to respond quickly to new opportunities, as well as withstand major setbacks.

Thus, despite costs of many billions of dollars, plus the threat of ongoing litigation, BP is emerging from the Deepwater Horizon debacle more strongly than some anticipated. And, this is despite the initial blunders, including by former CEO Tony Hayward, in managing the crisis in 2010 which saw its share price almost halve at one point.

This is not to underestimate the impact that the disaster has had on BP, including to its reputation. Nor the potential scale of the future challenge, including from unsettled Deepwater Horizon-related litigation, and enhanced stakeholder scrutiny. However, worst-case scenarios for the firm have been avoided.

Taken overall, the legacy of Deepwater Horizon therefore remains intensely controversial for the oil industry. Nevertheless, in the absence of further major debacles in the near future, deepwater drilling will continue apace, driven in large part by continuing increases in global demand for energy that may only intensify in coming years if emerging markets continue to grow robustly.

Original Article

While the NWF's study has been disputed, at least some evidence from other major spills indicates there can be long-term legacy on local ecosystems. This month, for example, also marks the 25thanniversary of the iconic Exxon Valdez disaster (when millions of gallons of oil were spilled in Alaska) where some species, including herring fish stocks, has still reportedly not fully recovered.

In this context, voices of disquiet continue to be raised about safety of oil drilling. Here broad-ranging concerns of environmentalists are at least two-fold.

Firstly, the huge international focus devoted to the 2010 disaster can obscure the fact that significant spills also occur elsewhere in the world on a relatively regular basis. In Nigeria, for instance, one 2006 report by environmentalists reportedly reached the staggering conclusion that the Niger Delta region has experienced the equivalent of an Exxon Valdez leak every year for almost half a century.

Secondly, much concern remains specifically focused on deepwater drilling locations where, over the last 5 years, it is estimated that some 60% of new international hydrocarbon reserves have been discovered. It is asserted that, despite ongoing reviews to safety measures, and better technology, the prospect of future disasters, potentially akin to Deepwater Horizon, remains significant owing in part to the remoteness and depth of some locations, and the resulting challenges posed by the recovery of oil.

While scientific and technological innovation can enable greater safety in the future, 'risk-free' drilling is unrealistic. Moreover, modern technology can be a double-edged sword for oil companies.

This factor was emphasized in a report last week by reinsurance broker Willis Group. The study asserted that too much of the energy sector has no insurance against major cyber attacks and that this could threaten "a major energy catastrophe - on the same scale - as...Exxon Valdez or Deepwater Horizon".

As the report noted, modern technology now allows oil and gas networks to be operated remotely. However, this provides scope for hackers and /or computer viruses to potentially target the electronic infrastructure meaning oil pipelines or refineries could be placed at new risk.

According to the study, the US Department for Homeland Security asserts that over 40% of attacks on US critical national infrastructure was targeted on energy firms in the year to September 2012. Willis claims that this situation represents a "time bomb" and that energy companies need to enhance their cyber defenses.

Despite these conventional and unconventional challenges, the post-2010 appetite of major oil firms to operate in deepwater areas remains strong. Firstly, despite the risks, these locations are proving a rewarding frontier for oil exploration.

And given rising global demand for energy, not least in emerging markets, governments are generally permitting firms to operate in deepwater locations. In the Gulf of Mexico, for instance, the US government awarded the first new post-disaster deepwater drilling permit in March 2011, less than a year after the spill began.

Indeed, earlier this year Washington also, controversially, lifted its suspension on BP BP -0.61% securing new leases in the Gulf in exchange for an agreement whereby the company must comply with specific corporate governance, ethics, and safety procedures. Following this decision, BP was the highest bidder last month on 24 of 31 new leases for exploration in the region valued at over 40 billion dollars.

Another key reason why offshore drilling will continue apace is the resilience of leading oil firms to wide-ranging international risks. The scale and profitability of these giants typically equip them to respond quickly to new opportunities, as well as withstand major setbacks.

Thus, despite costs of many billions of dollars, plus the threat of ongoing litigation, BP is emerging from the Deepwater Horizon debacle more strongly than some anticipated. And, this is despite the initial blunders, including by former CEO Tony Hayward, in managing the crisis in 2010 which saw its share price almost halve at one point.

This is not to underestimate the impact that the disaster has had on BP, including to its reputation. Nor the potential scale of the future challenge, including from unsettled Deepwater Horizon-related litigation, and enhanced stakeholder scrutiny. However, worst-case scenarios for the firm have been avoided.

Taken overall, the legacy of Deepwater Horizon, therefore, remains intensely controversial for the oil industry. Nevertheless, in the absence of further major debacles in the near future, deepwater drilling will continue apace, driven in large part by continuing increases in global demand for energy that may only intensify in coming years if emerging markets continue to grow robustly.

Original Article

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
As your legal advocates we protect your rights, and help calm the waters.
Contact Our Office Now

Have questions? Contact us to set up a consultation.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Aloia, Roland, Lubell & Morgan, PLLC
2254 1st Street
Fort Myers, FL 33901

Toll Free: 800-724-7902
Phone: 239-603-6143
Fax: 239-791-7951
Map & Directions

Email Us